This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Congress news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Chevron doctrine. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest bipartisan consensus news, Chevron deference news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
lawmaking capacityRoll Call
•81% Informative
A handful of recent Supreme Court decisions have set the stage for a tsunami of litigation challenging regulations and administrative rulings.
Some liberals want to see Congress resurrect Chevron deference legislatively.
Republicans are considering bills that would build on the court’s deregulatory momentum.
Overall, staff levels in Congress haven’t changed much in the past 50 years .
There’s no built-in constituency opposed to more staff or better pay, but voters rarely judge members of Congress on their stewardship of the legislative branch.
Members in tight reelection campaigns are often loath to do anything that smacks of rewarding themselves.
Uncertainty in how the new Supreme Court precedents will play out in the lower courts will keep Congress from moving quickly.
VR Score
85
Informative language
84
Neutral language
56
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links