This is a U.S. news story, published by Scientific American, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from Scientific American, you can click here:
more news from Scientific AmericanOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
deportation camps. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest death camps news, Mass Deportation news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
concentration campsScientific American
•65% Informative
If Donald Trump is elected, he and his advisers promise to remove from the U.S. , via forced expulsions and deportation camps, as many as 20 million people.
Donald Trump ’s plan to launch a massive deportation project draws on the same flawed historical rationales and pseudoscience that built support for concentration camps worldwide in the 20th century .
Prejudice has always been a part of concentration camps.
Donald Trump has promised to deport 4 percent of the current U.S. population in a plan to create “vast holding facilities that would function as staging centers’s staging centers, authors say.
The camps are in no way scientific or even serious policy; they’re the equivalent of dropping a hydrogen bomb to put out a forest fire, they say.
VR Score
67
Informative language
65
Neutral language
14
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
33
Source diversity
21
Affiliate links
no affiliate links