This is a news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Biden news.
For more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Washington ExaminerOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Heritage Foundation. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest radical policy proposals news, second term agenda news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
campaign speechWashington Examiner
•64% Informative
The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 has become synonymous with an alleged dystopian blueprint for a Trump presidency.
It has since been featured in nearly every campaign speech by Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris .
Project 2025 said only five of the 31 items listed were true or partially true, but the rest of the items were labeled false or misleading.
Project 2025 doesn’t serve as a manifesto, often including contradictory policy proposals, with different authors putting forward their beliefs.
For the book, the Heritage Foundation “cast a wide net,” with about two-thirds of contributing authors not being a part of the organization.
VR Score
66
Informative language
61
Neutral language
63
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links