This is a Arizona news story, published by Arizona Capitol Times, that relates primarily to Patricia Habak news.
For more Arizona news, you can click here:
more Arizona newsFor more Patricia Habak news, you can click here:
more Patricia Habak newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Arizona Capitol Times, you can click here:
more news from Arizona Capitol TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Abortion Access. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest term abortions news, abortion news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
abortion rightsArizona Capitol Times
•
65% Informative
An anti-abortion group wants to prevent a citizen initiative that would enshrine abortion rights into the state’s Constitution from going to the ballot.
The group behind the measure, Arizona for Abortion Access, is arguing in court that their measure should be summarized without the phrase “unborn human being” in an informative pamphlet that is sent out to voters ahead of the election.
The initiative would provide exceptions for abortion after fetal viability for the mental health of the mother, which La Sota argued would allow abortion up to birth.
Dr. Patricia Habak , a board certified obstetrician and gynecologist, said the phrase “unborn human being” is not medically accepted and not used in teaching or medical literature.
But Habak conceded under questioning by Kory Langhofer that there are times a doctor might use such a phrase.
VR Score
70
Informative language
69
Neutral language
67
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links