This is a Alaska news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to John Avlon news.
For more Alaska news, you can click here:
more Alaska newsFor more John Avlon news, you can click here:
more John Avlon newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court decision. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Alaska case news, recent Supreme Court decisions news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
major questions doctrineVox
•79% Informative
John Avlon : Supreme Court struck down Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan last year .
Avlon says GOP -controlled Supreme Court took extraordinary liberties with law, misreading a statute.
He says in a case known as Alaska v. Cardona, a trio of red-state attorneys general are asking the Supreme Court to neutralize much of a separate student loans plan which relies on an entirely different statute to justify its existence.
Ruben Navarrette : The student loan policy in Nebraska was authorized by a law known as the Heroes Act .
He says the law gives the Education secretary broad authority to cancel student loans during a national emergency.
He asks: The Heroes Act waived a lengthy process known as “notice and comment” that federal agencies normally must undergo before changing federal policy.
Navarro: It raises serious questions about whether the Republican justices were interpreting the law in good faith.
VR Score
81
Informative language
80
Neutral language
40
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links