This is a news story, published by Gizmodo, that relates primarily to Sam Altman news.
For more Sam Altman news, you can click here:
more Sam Altman newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Gizmodo, you can click here:
more news from GizmodoOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
basic income. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest income news, basic income payments news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
OpenAI CEO Sam AltmanGizmodo
•81% Informative
Sam Altman has long been a proponent of basic income.
A new study by OpenResearch finds that basic income doesn't lead to upward mobility.
The study was funded by Altman , who has long supported the idea of artificial intelligence eliminating millions of jobs.
The researchers concluded that while regular payments can help recipients pay for basic stuff like housing, transportation, and groceries, they don’t necessarily lead to greater upward mobility, they could never act as a replacement for a job.
Food, housing, and transportation were the largest expenditures for participants overall at the time of enrollment, the report says.
For some participants, the extra $ 1,000 a month isn’t enough to drastically reshape the economic outlook of that person’s life.
The reasons for the poor results could likely be a million different ways but one easy takeaway seems to be that solving poverty isn't a quick and easy process.
VR Score
86
Informative language
92
Neutral language
49
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links