This is a news story, published by Electronic Frontier Foundation, that relates primarily to Google news.
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsFor more news from Electronic Frontier Foundation, you can click here:
more news from Electronic Frontier FoundationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
new abuse images. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest sexual abuse images news, own investigation news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
massive scanningElectronic Frontier Foundation
•73% Informative
Google wrongly accused two men of child sexual abuse in New York Times article.
Authors: Google 's AI system failed, and Google 's employees failed to review the images.
They say Google has a right to decide which users it wants to host, but it was Google ’s incorrect algorithms, and its employees’ failed human review process.
EFF : Governments want companies like Google and Apple to constantly scan every digital space we have, including private spaces.
The EU proposal would use AI to scan text messages for “grooming” in an attempt to judge abuse that might happen in the future.
If billions of private messages in the EU are scanned with a false positive rate of “above 90% ,” it will result in millions of falsely flagged messages.
VR Score
74
Informative language
71
Neutral language
45
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links