This is a news story, published by ScienceDaily, that relates primarily to Daniel Rückert news.
For more Daniel Rückert news, you can click here:
more Daniel Rückert newsFor more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from ScienceDaily, you can click here:
more news from ScienceDailyOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
future medical chatbots. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest medical AI expert news, chatbots news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Medical chatbotsScienceDaily
•78% Informative
Medical chatbots make hasty diagnoses, do not adhere to guidelines, and would put patients' lives at risk.
Large language models may pass medical exams with flying colors but using them for diagnoses would currently be grossly negligent.
Despite the current shortcomings, the researchers see potential in the technology.
They have published a method that can be used to test the reliability of future medical chatbots.
In the future, large language models could become important tools for doctors, for example for discussing a case.
Prof. Daniel Rückert sees potential in the technology.
"We must always be aware of the limitations and peculiarities of this technology," says the medical AI expert.
VR Score
89
Informative language
94
Neutral language
63
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links