This is a news story, published by The Times & The Sunday Times, that relates primarily to Paul Johnson news.
For more Paul Johnson news, you can click here:
more Paul Johnson newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from The Times & The Sunday Times, you can click here:
more news from The Times & The Sunday TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
public spending audit. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest child poverty task force news, age benefit budget news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Fiscal StudiesThe Times & The Sunday Times
•68% Informative
MPs are already putting pressure on the new government to end the two -child limit.
It means most benefit recipients don’t get any extra money for third and subsequent children.
The long-term cost of reversing the limit would be about 3.4 billion a year.
It is equal to roughly 3% of the total working-age benefit budget.
Per pound spent, that would be well-targeted at reducing child poverty, says Paul Johnson .
Johnson : If middle-income people have to make financial trade-offs and sacrifices when it comes to deciding how many children to have, is it fair to have an open-ended commitment to poorer families who decide to have more children?.
VR Score
78
Informative language
81
Neutral language
49
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
41
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links