This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Jason Furman news.
For more Jason Furman news, you can click here:
more Jason Furman newsFor more inflation news, you can click here:
more inflation newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about inflation, you might also like this article about
corporate tax rate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest corporate tax cut news, more taxes news, news about inflation, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
corporate tax cutsCNBC
•61% Informative
A former Council of Economic Advisers chairman, Jason Furman and EJ Jantoni talk about the tax plan.
They say it would raise taxes on people that buy anything that has any component that's made abroad.
The Tax Foundation is a conservative organization. They're enthusiastic about tax cuts. They've said that these corporate tax cuts would cost something like $750 billion . They might actually be paid for.
When you say bringing on the base, how would you do it? And what number would you bring it down to, both on personal and then separately on the corporate rate? On the personal, I think we could basically keep the tax rates we have now if we were aggressive at broadening the base.
On the corporate side, I don't think there's much base broadening left, which is why no one's proposed it.
VR Score
70
Informative language
70
Neutral language
55
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
26
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links