This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Elsevier news.
For more Elsevier news, you can click here:
more Elsevier newsFor more writing and literature news, you can click here:
more writing and literature newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like writing and literature news, you might also like this article about
such journals. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest journals news, academic publishing news, writing and literature news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
single paywalled articleGuardian
•81% Informative
The annual revenues of commercial publishers Elsevier , Wiley , Taylor & Francis , Springer Nature, and SAGE are each in the billions .
Academic researchers do the research, write the articles, vet them for quality and edit the journals.
Publishers then sell access to these journals to the very same universities and institutions that fund research and editorial labour.
The term for this is diamond” open access, which means publishers charge neither authors, editors, nor readers.
Librarians have been urging this for years .
But academics still face a massive collective action problem: we want a new arrangement but each of us is incentivised to stick with the status quo.
VR Score
82
Informative language
82
Neutral language
19
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
13
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links