This is a the United States news story, published by Mother Jones, that relates primarily to Sackett news.
For more the United States news, you can click here:
more the United States newsFor more Sackett news, you can click here:
more Sackett newsFor more environmental science news, you can click here:
more environmental science newsFor more news from Mother Jones, you can click here:
more news from Mother JonesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like environmental science news, you might also like this article about
significant environmental legal cases. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest future environmental cases news, environmental law expert news, environmental science news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
wetlandsMother Jones
•87% Informative
A new study from Yale and the University of Massachusetts , Amherst , published in Science last week , reveals why removing federal protections for some non-permanent waters could have a huge effect on the nation’s rivers.
The study focused on short-lived streams, fueled by rain or snow, called “ephemeral streams,” which the Sackett decision now excludes from federal protection under the Clean Water Act .
More than half of the water in the United States ’ major rivers originates in this type of stream.
In 2022 , the Supreme Court agreed to take up Sackett , a case about what type of waterways should count as “waters of the United States ” The Biden administration then issued new regulations excluding ephemeral streams from coverage under the Clean Water Act .
House Democrats introduced a bill to undo the changes made under Sackett but “the odds are against it” passing in a divided Congress .
VR Score
91
Informative language
91
Neutral language
54
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links