This is a Trump news story, published by Default, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
For more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsFor more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Default, you can click here:
more news from DefaultOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
broad presidential immunity. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Trump prosecution news, presidential accountability news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
presidential immunityDefault
•73% Informative
The Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States about presidential immunity in the prosecution of former President Donald Trump for conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
David Gergen : Many people seem to have a strong opinion about whether the Court ’s recognition of fairly broad presidential immunity was “right” or “wrong” But the standard sources of constitutional law do not permit a definitive answer to that question.
Gergen says the Court faced a slew of novel questions about the scope of presidential power.
David Gergen : Court 's decision could give an unscrupulous president wide scope for corrupt behavior.
He says the decision enhances presidential power far beyond what was previously settled.
Gergen says the main result of the rush to the Supreme Court is a monumental precedent in support of presidential power.
The reactions to the decision also turn on different assessments of the political consequences of the decision.
VR Score
78
Informative language
77
Neutral language
19
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links