This is a US news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Trump news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Trump surrogates. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest conservative Trump loyalists news, conservative Heritage Foundation thinktank news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
former White House adviserGuardian
•67% Informative
Project 2025 is a rightwing blueprint for a radical takeover of the US government if the former president is re-elected in November .
It includes calls for replacing civil servants with Trump loyalists, eliminating the education department, putting the justice department under the president’s thumb and banning the abortion pill.
Democrats have made concerted efforts to say the document would be representative of a second Trump presidency.
But last week Trump tried to disown the initiative, saying he has 'no idea' who is behind it.
Of the 38 people involved in the writing and editing of Project 2025 , 31 of them were nominated to positions in Trump ’s administration or transition team.
81% of the document's creators held formal roles in the Trump administration.
Rubio also dismissed the importance of comments by the Heritage Foundation's president, Kevin Roberts .
VR Score
70
Informative language
66
Neutral language
47
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links