This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Trump news.
For more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Justice Sotomayor. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Justice Jackson news, military coup news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
dissentFoxnews
•63% Informative
Jonathan Turley , Andrew Cherkaski and Shannon Shannon Shannon: This is a major victory for the former President Trump .
Turley : Justice Sotomayor 's dissent doesn't show the same vigor in looking at the opposing view.
Cherakaski : The language used by the court is telegraphing that there is a heavy advantage for Trump because the language used is highly favorable to him.
Shannon: The timing of this obviously is crucial.
President Trump was protected entirely in that speech under the First Amendment .
The court is saying here that he also may be protected as a point of presidential duties.
So going forward, it's going to get tough because Jack Smith is known as someone who tends to double down on weak hands. That's why he was unanimously overturned in a previous high profile case.
VR Score
72
Informative language
73
Neutral language
62
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
37
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links