This is a news story, published by San Diego Union-Tribune, that relates primarily to Maduros news.
For more Maduros news, you can click here:
more Maduros newsFor more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsFor more news from San Diego Union-Tribune, you can click here:
more news from San Diego Union-TribuneOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
firearms excise tax. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Second Amendment news, other Second Amendment groups news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
new California lawSan Diego Union-Tribune
•76% Informative
Lawmakers approved the tax to fund a new Gun Violence Prevention and School Safety Fund .
Gun-rights groups and individuals challenging the new tax say it violates the Constitution because it has no historically similar law and unfairly disfavors the Second Amendment as compared to other rights.
Lawsuit seeks to enjoin the state from enforcing the law and collecting the tax.
That ruling established that gun laws must be “rooted in the Second Amendment’s text, as informed by history,” and must be “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” The lawsuit alleges that Maduros and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration “will be unable to present widespread, relevantly-similar analogues from the Founding era to support the tax.” The Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition are the other plaintiffs in the case..
VR Score
76
Informative language
73
Neutral language
62
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links