This is a Washington DC news story, published by Telegraph, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Washington DC news, you can click here:
more Washington DC newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Telegraph, you can click here:
more news from TelegraphOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
presidential immunity. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest immunity claim news, immunity news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
immunity rulingTelegraph
•
61% Informative
Donald Trump may be immune from charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election.
The court split 6-3 along partisan lines to rule that presidents cannot be prosecuted for actions that fall within their “core constitutional” roles.
Official acts are entitled to a “presumption of immunity’, meaning the burden is on Jack Smith , the special counsel who brought the indictment against Trump , to rebut the immunity claim.
The district court in Washington DC will decide which charges Trump can claim presidential immunity from.
A New York jury convicted Trump of 34 counts of falsifying records related to a hush-money payment made to Stormy Daniels .
His legal team are now arguing that the conviction should be overturned because the jury considered evidence from his presidency, which would have been covered by the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.
VR Score
69
Informative language
68
Neutral language
68
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links