This is a news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to Samuel Alito news.
For more Samuel Alito news, you can click here:
more Samuel Alito newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
EMTALA abortion case. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest acute medical emergencies abortion care news, Justices Clarence Thomas news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
big abortion caseSlate Magazine
•63% Informative
Frida Ghitis: Justice Samuel Alito was furious at the court’s decision to hold off on deciding a big abortion case.
She says the majority of the court (and all of its females) found the issue too “emotional” to do the hard work of denying women in acute medical emergencies abortion care.
Ghitis says it's gross, but not unexpected, that often when the court fractures along gender lines, as it has frequently this term, you will hear a whole lot of the jovial “Calm down, little missy” talk.
Sally Kohn : Sen. Susan Collins and Sen. Ben Sasse called women “hysterical” for sounding the alarm about Roe .
She says the gaslighting is rote: women voicing fears about women’s outcomes is “fearmongering” and hysteria” Sohn : Roberts is not even willing to engage with Sotomayor and Jackson on the merits because cheap-shot name-calling stands in for analysis.
It is how he governs and how he will continue to govern. Women who point this out as clear and obvious truths are maligned and dismissed as irrational. It’s almost as if the conservative justices’ commitment to originalism requires them to believe that women who raise any objection to their tidy paradigms should be viewed as either empty vessels or scheming witches. It’s almost as if they wish to lay down the tracks for just such a project. It’s almost as if in granting Donald Trump immunity, they may have found their path there..
VR Score
64
Informative language
63
Neutral language
35
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
21
Source diversity
18
Affiliate links
no affiliate links