This is a Trump news story, published by The Atlantic, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
For more Trump news, you can click here:
more Trump newsFor more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The Atlantic, you can click here:
more news from The AtlanticOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Trump justices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Biden justices news, bribes President Jane Jones news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
impeachment courtThe Atlantic
•69% Informative
Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court ruling on ex-presidents' lawsuits against ex-Presidents is wrong.
She says the majority opinion turns the Constitution 's text and structure inside out and upside down.
Ghitis says the Constitution says a president who takes a bribe can be impeached for bribery can be booted from office.
She asks: What does this document, the supreme law of our land, actually say about lawsuits against former presidents? Ghitis.
David Gergen : The Court split along sharply partisan lines in Trump v. United States .
Gergen says the Court failed to live up to America 's highest ideals: nonpartisan justice and the rule of law.
He says liberal dissenters came much closer to the constitutional mark, but they, too, made mistakes in the case.
He writes: No one is above the law; not presidents, not ex-presidents, not justices either.
VR Score
74
Informative language
74
Neutral language
22
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links