This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to HRW news.
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
Human Rights Watch. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest privacy news, privacy risks news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
privacy settingsArs Technica
•83% Informative
HRW researcher finds 190 photos of Australian kids linked in LAION-5B , a popular AI dataset.
The images are linked in the dataset without the knowledge or consent of the children or their families, HRW says.
LAION is working with HRW to remove links to all the images flagged, but not yet removed from the dataset, researcher says.
LAION: Kids whose images are used to train AI models are exposed to a variety of harms, including a risk that image generators could more convincingly create harmful or explicit deepfakes.
For First Nations children, the inclusion of links to photos threatens unique harms.
LAION recommends that parents remove images of kids online as the most effective way to prevent abuse.
VR Score
88
Informative language
91
Neutral language
46
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links