This is a news story, published by Los Angeles Times, that relates primarily to Michael Hiltzik news.
For more Michael Hiltzik news, you can click here:
more Michael Hiltzik newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Los Angeles Times, you can click here:
more news from Los Angeles TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Chevron ruling. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Chevron decision news, subsequent federal rulings news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
original Chevron rulingLos Angeles Times
•77% Informative
Michael Hiltzik : With its Chevron ’ ruling, the Supreme Court shows that it thinks it’s smarter than scientific experts.
The ruling amounts to an apogee of arrogance on the part of the conservative majority, wrote Justice Elena Kagan in a dissent.
It could subject agency decisions on scientifically based issues such as clean air and water regulations and healthcare standards to endless nitpicking, he says.
Hiltz: Conservatives have had it in for Chevron for a long time; its death has been a foregone conclusion.
Frida Ghitis: Conservatives have won big legal victories by choosing right-wing judges, but the federal court system has finally gotten fed up.
She says the Chevron ruling of 1984 and Monday ’s ruling both served a goal shared by Anne Gorsuch and her offspring: Giving judges leeway they might need to see things the way Big Business prefers.
Ghitis says Chevron deference isn’t about “resolving ambiguities” in the law.
Scalia wrote in a 1989 law review article that Chevron deference made sense in the modern world.
Over time, he grew discontented with the doctrine.
Monday ’s decision puts the lie to conservatives’ oft-expressed disdain for policies made by “unelected” bureaucrats.
VR Score
80
Informative language
78
Neutral language
52
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links