This is a news story, published by CBS News, that relates primarily to the Supreme Court news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CBS News, you can click here:
more news from CBS NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
federal gun restrictions. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest separate federal firearms restrictions news, state firearms restrictions news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
latest Second Amendment rulingCBS News
•85% Informative
The cases had been pending before the court for months while it considered the constitutionality of a 30-year-old law disarming alleged domestic abusers.
In an 8 -1 ruling last month , the court found that the Second Amendment allows an individual who poses a credible threat to the safety of others to be banned from having firearms temporarily.
On the heels of that decision, the Supreme Court tossed out lower court rulings invalidating two separate federal firearms restrictions as applied to their individual challengers.
The impact of the Supreme Court's latest Second Amendment ruling on these cases was not immediately clear.
The majority did provide some additional guidance about what founding-era firearms regulations the government can put forth to justify a modern-day restriction.
The court acknowledged that the nation has a long tradition of laws disarming individuals who pose a "clear threat of physical violence" to another.
VR Score
90
Informative language
91
Neutral language
65
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links