This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Bella Hadid news.
For more Bella Hadid news, you can click here:
more Bella Hadid newsFor more music news, you can click here:
more music newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like music news, you might also like this article about
violent rhetoric targets Hamas. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Palestinian militantism news, genocide anthem news, music news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Hamas militantsWired
•70% Informative
YouTube determined that the song’s violent rhetoric targets Hamas , not Palestinians as a whole, according to sources.
YouTube 's trust and safety team consulted executives and reviewed internal and external expert interpretations of the lyrics.
The ultimate finding was that one of the song's opening lines, which describes rodents coming out of tunnels, was about Hamas and therefore does not qualify as hate speech.
The lyrics state, by some interpretations, “every dog’s day will come’ while referring to Bella Hadid , Dua Lipa , and Mia Khalifa .
But YouTube has found that the apparently critical mentions of the stars do not rise to harassment.
YouTube says its policies allow for greater criticism of governments and terrorist organizations.
Sources point to The Civil Front , a pro-Israeli channel launched last October 16 that has attracted over 2,000 subscribers, as a stark case of the double standards.
YouTube’s Malon says nothing was atypical in YouTube 's response in this case.
Sources inside Google view a contrast in a case last week for a video that appeared to glorify Palestinian militantism.
VR Score
60
Informative language
52
Neutral language
44
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
21
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links