This is a US news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Biden news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newsFor more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
local news channels. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest local journalism news, local news news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
local news coverageGuardian
•74% Informative
Sinclair, one of the largest owners of US television stations, has established itself as an influential player in the conservative movement by using trusted local news channels to spread disinformation.
The company gained notoriety in 2018 for requiring local anchors across the country to read a script that warned of fake news’ Sinclair owns or operates 185 TV stations in 86 markets.
The media analysts were critical of Sinclair ’s reporting on the RNC clips of Biden and its repetition of a Wall Street Journal report questioning his mental fitness.
Vogel and Legum both said it didn’t make them rethink their criticism of Sinclair , as the company still ran RNC clips that were manipulated or taken out of context.
VR Score
75
Informative language
71
Neutral language
38
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links