This is a U.S. news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
other Supreme Court cases. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest new justices news, Justices Jackson news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme CourtThe New Republic
•72% Informative
Donald Trump was indicted on four counts of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and obstructing the counting of Electoral College votes on January 6, 2021 .
David Rothkopf : In effect Donald Trump cannot be held accountable for almost any of his efforts to retain power beyond his term.
He says the court has created a paradigm shift: “The Court has unilaterally altered the balance of power between the three coordinate branches of our Government as it relates to the Rule of Law , aggrandizing power in the Judiciary and the Executive ”.
Frida Ghitis: Supreme Court's decision creates a vast scope of presidential immunity.
She says it's a " five alarm fire that threatens to consume democratic self-governance" She says the court's majority made a completely new ruling without discussing historical sources from the founding era.
Ghitis says there's still a slim chance for prosecuting Trump for some of the charges.
Supreme Court has effectively ruled that 250 years of U.S. history under a republic is enough, says Julian Zelizer .
Zelizer: The court is doing so much to undermine the U.K. government and Constitution .
He says President Biden must take advantage of the fact that the number of justices on the court is flexible. He should appoint four new justices who have some integrity.
VR Score
78
Informative language
79
Neutral language
14
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links