This is a US news story, published by CNN, that relates primarily to Chevron news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CNN, you can click here:
more news from CNNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Supreme Court ruling. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Chevron doctrine news, next big regulatory legal fight news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
major Supreme Court ruling FridayCNN
•81% Informative
The Supreme Court overturned a 1984 precedent that allowed courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute in circumstances in which the law in question is vaguely written.
The precedent is deeply entrenched in administrative law, with Republican and Democratic administrations using it to shield regulatory action from legal attack.
The ruling has injected legal uncertainty into regulations of all types, including those on technology, labor, the environment and health care.
The decision may immediately affect a hot-button rule issued this year by the Federal Trade Commission banning noncompete clauses in employer contracts.
The American Cancer Society and other health associations warn in a friend-of-the-court brief that the reversal of Chevron could unleash a “litigation tsunami,” even on long-settled policy.
The ruling could open the door to legal challenges to the decisions made by government’s public health agencies.
Chevron could complicate the US government’s efforts to regulate data brokers, social media platforms, artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency and more.
Shifting regulatory power from agencies to the courts gives well-resourced companies even more power to fend off regulations they view as harmful.
Chevron has been a major reason the Federal Communications Commission is recognized as having the power to regulate — and deregulate — internet service providers.
VR Score
84
Informative language
84
Neutral language
44
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
74
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links