This is a news story, published by Live Science, that relates primarily to Maggie Ruderman news.
For more Maggie Ruderman news, you can click here:
more Maggie Ruderman newsFor more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsFor more news from Live Science, you can click here:
more news from Live ScienceOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
first gender reveal party baby. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest gender test news, gender reveal game news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
gender revealsLive Science
β’74% Informative
Gender reveal parties are a testament to how society is squeezing children into one of two predetermined gender boxes before they are born.
Advancements in genetic research have led to the development of a simple blood test called cell-free DNA prenatal screening.
It screens for whether a baby has extra or missing pieces of genetic information β chromosomes β as early as 10 weeks into pregnancy.
The idea that biology plays the largest role in determining who an individual is, or bioessentialism, has governed misconceptions about sex and gender for many years .
Upholding binary constructs of sex does not allow for individuality and gender fluidity, says Maggie Ruderman , MS , CGC (she/her).
VR Score
76
Informative language
76
Neutral language
59
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
26
Source diversity
13