This is a news story, published by Salon, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
For more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Salon, you can click here:
more news from SalonOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
significant Supreme Court decisions. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest wing justices news, radical Court majority news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
justicesSalon
•70% Informative
David Gergen : Friday 's Supreme Court decisions fit a guideline that explains the conservative majority’s recent spate of key decisions.
He says they manipulate the law to accommodate the victory of a would-be dictator who suits them as president and nominator of their replacements.
Gergen says the majority made clear its intent to follow right-wing ideology — unless doing so would hinder their preferred candidate's election, in which ideology yields, at least temporarily.
Supreme Court upheld FDA guidelines for distributing mifepristone, an over-the-counter abortion pill, on June 13 .
Frida Ghitis : We know how strong the backlash that followed was in the 2022 midterms and in elections since, with abortion rights winning every vote where they were on the ballot.
She says the court ruled on technical grounds, deciding that the plaintiff lacked standing because it failed to show it had suffered a concrete and particularized injury from the distribution of the abortion pill; there was no decision on the merits of the case.
VR Score
70
Informative language
66
Neutral language
25
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
54
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links