This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Alex Castellanos news.
For more Alex Castellanos news, you can click here:
more Alex Castellanos newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
DC January 6th charges. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court Fisher decision news, January 6th committee news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
obstruction statuteTheplatform
•62% Informative
Alex Castellanos : Ruling changes the scope of the obstruction of an official proceeding, but does not eliminate the four counts against Donald Trump .
He says the Supreme Court's narrow interpretation would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison.
Hafey: The ruling doesn't give Trump an opening to describe what happened on January 6th as, say, activism.
Alex Castellanos : Chances are likely to be somewhere in the middle that that from the questions asked during the oral argument, there may be some zone of conduct by a president while in office that the court may find is immunized.
That would kick this back to Judge Chuck in to get briefing and have argument as to how the special counsel's evidence fits the test.
VR Score
70
Informative language
70
Neutral language
53
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links