This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to The Supreme Court news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
obstruction statute. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest obstruction news, Capitol attack news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
obstruction chargeInsider
•76% Informative
The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the obstruction statute used to prosecute the January 6, 2021 , defendants was employed too broadly by the Department of Justice .
Legal experts told Business Insider the decision was great news for Trump and could result in resentencing for certain January 6 defendants.
But the case against him "has not disappeared," given his other charges, one legal expert said.
VR Score
78
Informative language
77
Neutral language
26
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links