This is a news story, published by The Nation, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from The Nation, you can click here:
more news from The NationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
powers Supreme Court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Biggest Supreme Court Power Grab news, biggest judicial power grab news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
environmental protectionsThe Nation
•66% Informative
The Supreme Court overruled Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council , a 1984 case that instructed the judiciary to defer to the president and the president’s experts in executive agencies when determining how best to enforce laws passed by Congress .
Julian Zelizer : The Constitution says, quite clearly, that Congress passes laws, the president enforces them.
Zelizer says the court has no role in determining whether Congress was right to pass the law, or if the executive branch is right to enforce it.
The word “unconstitutional” appears nowhere in the Constitution , and the power to decide what is or is not constitutional was not given to the court in Constitution or by any of the amendments.
The court has no enforcement power of its own, so there’s no inherent reason either the president or Congress has to defer to its demands, other than convention and tradition.
But most of the time, the elected branches will largely do what the court tells it to do.
To call ourselves a “democracy” after today is a sick joke. We are not a democracy. We don’t deserve democracy.
The Supreme Court knows that the people are too addled and distracted to even raise a sustained protest against their rulings.
There is literally nothing that can be done to restore the rights the Supreme Court has taken away.
VR Score
68
Informative language
65
Neutral language
12
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links