This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to EPA news.
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
ozone rules. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest pollution controls news, ozone news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme Court decisionsArs Technica
•78% Informative
The US Supreme Court issued an emergency ruling that places a stay on rules developed by the EPA .
The rules were meant to limit the spread of ozone-generating pollutants across state lines.
The decision was handled on an emergency basis, the decision was made without any evidence gathered during lower court proceedings.
The justices don't even agree on the nature of the regulations the EPA has proposed.
VR Score
85
Informative language
90
Neutral language
3
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links