This is a news story, published by CBS News, that relates primarily to George Jarkesy news.
For more George Jarkesy news, you can click here:
more George Jarkesy newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from CBS News, you can click here:
more news from CBS NewsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
justices. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest securities fraud news, federal district court news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Supreme CourtCBS News
•86% Informative
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the SEC in a dispute over the agency's ability to use in-house tribunals to seek civil penalties against defendants for securities fraud.
The case arose in 2013 , when the SEC brought an administrative proceeding against George Jarkesy .
The court split along ideological lines, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the conservative majority.
VR Score
90
Informative language
91
Neutral language
83
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links