This is a China news story, published by Rest of World, that relates primarily to Jeffrey Knockel news.
For more China news, you can click here:
more China newsFor more Jeffrey Knockel news, you can click here:
more Jeffrey Knockel newsFor more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsFor more news from Rest of World, you can click here:
more news from Rest of WorldOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
Chinese censorship. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest major Chinese search engines news, Bing translation service news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Bing search censorship resultsRest of World
•85% Informative
University of Toronto's Citizen Lab found Microsoft censors its Bing translation results more than top Chinese services.
Bing became the only major foreign translation and search engine service available in China after Google withdrew from the Chinese market in 2010 .
Bing's practices “harm people’s ability to communicate with an entire demographic of people,” said Jeffrey Knockel .
Microsoft appears to be playing it safe to avoid Chinese government backlash.
Chinese firms likely have access to more Chinese -language data, enabling more precise censorship.
Microsoft may have recently expanded its China -based censorship.
Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent , and NetEase did not respond to Rest of World’s requests for comment.
VR Score
86
Informative language
85
Neutral language
69
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
18
Source diversity
16
Affiliate links
no affiliate links