This is a news story, published by Lancaster University, that relates primarily to CSR news.
For more human rights news, you can click here:
more human rights newsFor more news from Lancaster University, you can click here:
more news from Lancaster UniversityOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about human rights, you might also like this article about
higher social classes today. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest corporate social responsibility news, higher education ideologies news, news about human rights, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
corporate communicationLancaster University
•
84% Informative
People from the corporate world and higher education sectors are increasingly adopting each other’s speech patterns to be more socially inclusive.
This form of engagement, known as resonance, has increased mostly among people in higher social grades.
People tend to engage with their peers especially when they (re)use their language and make it relevant for the continuation of the interaction.
A consistent absence of resonance indicates interactional detachment’ and a marked lack of engagement (this is distinctive in Autism speech). Social grades involving manual labour and communities excluded from CSR did not show a significant increase in how they resonate with their language.
VR Score
87
Informative language
88
Neutral language
71
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links