This is a Charlottesville news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Charlottesville news, you can click here:
more Charlottesville newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
Snopes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest doublespeak misrepresents news, white supremacists news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
conservative media outletsThe New Republic
•52% Informative
Donald Trump infamously said there were “very fine people on both sides” of the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville , Virginia .
Snopes.com have published a piece declaring it “false” that Trump was referring to neo- Nazis and white supremacists.
Frida Ghitis: Snopes misrepresents the reality of Donald Trump's remarks on neo-Nazi rally.
She says Snopes fell for the semantic dance Trump performed, where implicit validation undercut explicit condemnation.
Trump ’s tactic of occupying every possible rhetorical position allows his supporters to cherry-pick the most favorable interpretation, she says.
Ghitis says the site inadvertently aided in the revisionist effort to downplay the truth.
VR Score
47
Informative language
43
Neutral language
30
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
43
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links