This is a news story, published by The Washington Times, that relates primarily to Biden news.
For more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from The Washington Times, you can click here:
more news from The Washington TimesOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
Starlink subsidies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Fiber internet news, Broadband Equity Access news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Starlink broadband serviceThe Washington Times
•
77% Informative
President Biden signed a $42.5 billion rural internet program into law in November 2021 .
The program has not connected a single rural home to high-speed internet service since then.
Elon Musk's Starlink broadband service is excluded from the BEAD federal subsidies because the money is reserved for companies deploying fiber-optic cable, which the government views as a more proven technology.
Starlink refused to remove urban areas, including Newark International Airport and Chicago Loop , from its funding bid.
“Starlink continues to make its service available to consumers, and nothing in the Commission ’s decision prevents consumers from choosing Starlink if it meets their needs,” Ms. Rosenworcel wrote.
VR Score
81
Informative language
82
Neutral language
54
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links