This is a U.S. news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Rahimi news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Rahimi news, you can click here:
more Rahimi newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
domestic gun violence. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest firearm regulations news, modern gun regulations news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Second AmendmentMSNBC
•79% Informative
David Gergen : In U.S. v. Rahimi , the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that a federal law restricting domestic violence offenders subject to restraining orders does not violate the Second Amendment .
Gergen says originalism, the idea that the meaning of the Constitution is fixed at the moment of ratification, remains binding today .
He says Rahimi is a reminder that it isn’t enough for the court to walk away from originalism: It should run.
And rejecting originalism is a necessary part of building an inclusive, egalitarian future. This article was originally published on MSNBC.com .
VR Score
83
Informative language
82
Neutral language
48
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links