This is a news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Suno news.
For more Suno news, you can click here:
more Suno newsFor more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsFor more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
unethical AI companies. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest lawsuits news, new lawsuits news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
RIAA claimTechCrunch
•62% Informative
Suno and Udio are being sued by the Recording Industry Association of America .
Julian Zelizer : If it goes before a jury, the trial could be both a damaging exposé and a useful precedent for similarly unethical AI companies facing legal peril.
He says the companies’ leadership and investors have been unwisely loose-lipped about the copyright challenges of the space.
Zelizer says it looks like these companies' goose is cooked.
The RIAA is suing Udio and Suno for allegedly re-creating entire works.
The companies say the system is not intended to replicate copyrighted works.
They say it's a desperate, naked attempt to offload liability onto users under Section 230 safe harbor.
But the argument seems unlikely to gain traction, partly because the company itself ignored copyright to begin with.
VR Score
51
Informative language
42
Neutral language
27
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links