This is a U.S. news story, published by Law & Crime, that relates primarily to Jack Smith news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Jack Smith news, you can click here:
more Jack Smith newsFor more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsFor more news from Law & Crime, you can click here:
more news from Law & CrimeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
Espionage Act prosecution. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal investigators news, special counsel Jack Smith news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
defendant Donald TrumpLaw & Crime
•71% Informative
Special Counsel Jack Smith filed a 33 -page rebuttal to Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the Espionage Act prosecution.
The former president is accused of willfully and unlawfully retaining “some of the nation’s most highly guarded secrets” in a “haphazard” way, including by keeping those documents in “cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes and shapes from his presidency.
The defense has asked U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to toss out the whole case.
Defending the Mar-a-Lago search as lawful and respectful to Trump , Smith said the defense has come up with “no evidence of bad faith” and no evidence that federal agents destroyed exculpatory evidence. Read the prosecution’s response here. Have a tip we should know? [email protected].
VR Score
65
Informative language
57
Neutral language
67
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links