This is a US news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Assange news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
WikiLeaks. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Assange news, Espionage Act news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
notorious Russian hacking groupsWired
•
63% Informative
The case against Assange centers around the publishing of more than 750,000 stolen US documents by WikiLeaks between 2009 and 2011 .
WikiLeaks published a trove of emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee ahead of the 2016 US presidential election.
Assange 's attorneys argued that due to his deteriorating mental health, extradition to the US would increase the likelihood of suicide.
VR Score
65
Informative language
69
Neutral language
28
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links