This is a news story, published by Slate Magazine, that relates primarily to Mark Joseph Stern news.
For more Mark Joseph Stern news, you can click here:
more Mark Joseph Stern newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from Slate Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Slate MagazineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Chief Justice John Roberts. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest conservative justices news, Justice Thomas news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Justice Clarence ThomasSlate Magazine
•71% Informative
The Supreme Court upheld a federal law that disarms domestic abusers.
Dahlia Lithwick , Mark Joseph Stern and Kelly Roskam discussed the decision on Saturday 's Amicus.
They say it's not a win for the court, but it's a step further down the road for gun safety.
Mark Joseph Stern : With regard to the Second Amendment , I think it's going to be a mixed bag.
Stern: The courts are going to splinter, and the Supreme Court’s going to have to come back and provide an answer, and then another, and another.
Stern hopes the court is so chastened by its experiment with originalism that it won’t be overly aggressive in pushing originalism.
This decision may stem the massive flow from the dam, but it doesn't provide any real clarity for other courts.
Other cases, I think, are going to be a little bit closer. There’s still so much opportunity for subjectivity all over every single substep of this test.
VR Score
76
Informative language
75
Neutral language
35
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
44
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
5
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links