This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Thomas news.
For more Thomas news, you can click here:
more Thomas newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
major gun rights case. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Second Amendment rights news, Second Amendment right news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Second AmendmentFoxnews
•58% Informative
The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor as we've been awaiting this case to come down of the Biden administration defending fed, the federal gun ban for domestic abusers.
Jonathan Turley : This is a dropped Hail Mary throw for Hunter Biden , who was just convicted of lying on a gun form.
Justice Thomas says the government cannot strip the Second Amendment right of anyone subject to a protective order, even if he has never been accused or convicted of a crime.
Thomas says government hasn't borne its burden.
Justice Thomas dissenting against what the 8 to one majority feel like was the proper upholding of this statutory measure.
VR Score
58
Informative language
54
Neutral language
62
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
34
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links