This is a news story, published by The Nation, that relates primarily to Bruen news.
For more Bruen news, you can click here:
more Bruen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from The Nation, you can click here:
more news from The NationOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Second Amendment cases. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest future extreme gun rulings news, Second Amendment news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Gun Ruling RightThe Nation
•61% Informative
The court’s Rahimi ruling seems like a victory for gun regulation but is actually an attempt to pave the way for future extreme gun rulings.
The case addressed whether domestic abusers are entitled to keep their guns under the Second Amendment , which is a critical question when you consider that a domestic abuser with a gun is an even more significant threat to women's health.
John Sutter : When he likes a law but realizes that upholding it goes against his ideological priors, he just makes stuff up.
He did this with Obamacare , converting it into a “tax” to avoid giving the government its obvious power to regulate health care under the Commerce Clause , he’s doing it again here.
Sutter says the court has not backed off its extremist interpretation of the Second Amendment .
Frida Ghitis: Justices Sotomayor and Kagandissented in Bruen but didn't listen to the man who actually wrote the majority opinion.
She says Thomas is 100 percent right about how to apply his own terrible reasoning from Bruen .
Ghitis says Thomas , not Roberts , is the one applying intellectual consistency to this issue.
VR Score
58
Informative language
54
Neutral language
8
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links