This is a Switzerland news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Malte Elson news.
For more Switzerland news, you can click here:
more Switzerland newsFor more Malte Elson news, you can click here:
more Malte Elson newsFor more United kingdom business & economics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom business & economics newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom business & economics, you might also like this article about
national debt. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest economists news, famous economists news, news about United kingdom business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
austerity eraWired
•84% Informative
Error-checking isn’t a standard part of publishing scientific papers, says Malte Elson , a researcher at the University of Bern in Switzerland .
Elson has set up a way to systematically find errors in scientific research.
The project is modeled on bug bounties in the software industry, where hackers are rewarded for finding errors in code.
Neuroscientist was shocked at the amount of errors that Russ Poldrack found in his study.
Even though they knew they were looking out for errors, Wessel ’s colleagues made errors at an ever greater rate.
Error-checking needs to be rewarded, says Brian Nosek , executive director of the nonprofit Center for Open Science (COS).
VR Score
92
Informative language
94
Neutral language
46
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
48
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links