This is a US news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Evan Corcoran news.
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsFor more Evan Corcoran news, you can click here:
more Evan Corcoran newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
memos recount Trump. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Corcoran memos news, voice memos news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
memosGuardian
•64% Informative
Trump is expected to ask judge to revoke prosecutors' access to memos made by his ex-lawyer Evan Corcoran .
The request will be made before US district judge Aileen Cannon at a sealed hearing Tuesday .
Trump ’s lawyers are expected to argue that none of the memos should have been given to prosecutors on the crime-fraud exception.
Trump ’s lawyers are also expected to argue that none of the commentary about Trump asking whether they needed to comply with the subpoena, or the plucking motion satisfied the crime-fraud exception because it did not amount to Trump using Corcoran 's legal advice for a crime.
VR Score
68
Informative language
68
Neutral language
46
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links