This is a U.S. news story, published by PsyPost, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more U.S. news, you can click here:
more U.S. newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more Us campaigns & elections news, you can click here:
more Us campaigns & elections newsFor more news from PsyPost, you can click here:
more news from PsyPostOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us campaigns & elections, you might also like this article about
emotional responses. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest negative emotions news, Emotion news, news about Us campaigns & elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
actual emotional responsesPsyPost
•76% Informative
People generally overestimate how intensely they would feel in the wake of the 2020 U.S. presidential election, according to new research published in the journal Cognition and Emotion .
Donald Trump supporters with particularly strong negative beliefs about Joe Biden experienced more intense emotions than they had anticipated.
Strong beliefs about the candidates were associated with more intense forecasts of emotion following the election.
Future research should explore similar relationships in different contexts and time periods to better understand the dynamics between beliefs, emotions, and voting behavior.
The study was conducted by Heather C. Lench , Leslie Fernandez , Noah Reed , Emily Raibley , Linda J. Levine , and Kiki Salsedo .
VR Score
87
Informative language
92
Neutral language
60
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links