This is a Texas news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals news.
For more Texas news, you can click here:
more Texas newsFor more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
federal appeals court. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest appeals news, appeals court news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal courtReuters
•81% Informative
A federal appeals court says the case should stay in Texas and not be sent to a judge in Washington , D.C. The ruling by a three -judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was a victory for business and banking groups challenging a key part of a crackdown on "junk fees" At issue is a rule that would block card issuers with more than one million open accounts from charging more than $8 for late fees.
Critics have accused the groups of "judge shopping".
VR Score
93
Informative language
98
Neutral language
82
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
47
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links