This is a Wuhan news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Steven Quay news.
For more Wuhan news, you can click here:
more Wuhan newsFor more Steven Quay news, you can click here:
more Steven Quay newsFor more epidemics & outbreaks news, you can click here:
more epidemics & outbreaks newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about epidemics & outbreaks, you might also like this article about
coronavirus origins. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest coronavirus news, Coronavirus Pandemic news, news about epidemics & outbreaks, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
conclusion coronavirusNational Review: Conservative News, Opinion, Politics, Policy, & Current Events
•84% Informative
Dr. Steven Quay , a scientist who authored a widely viewed Bayesian analysis concluding coronavirus originated from a lab, testified before the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee .
Quay read a detailed opening statement dissecting the data backing up his belief that the virus came from the Wuhan lab.
Garry made his case for the natural origin theory based on the virus supposedly spilling over twice and raccoon DNA apparently co-mingling with the virus.
Garry also argued the earliest cases of coronavirus clustered around the wet market early in the pandemic.
The scientists disagreed on the origins of the virus, all of them appeared to agree on the lack of transparency from the Chinese government and the WIV .
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
43
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
78
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links