This is a Burnette news story, published by ProPublica, that relates primarily to Burnette news.
For more Burnette news, you can click here:
more Burnette newsFor more Burnette news, you can click here:
more Burnette newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from ProPublica, you can click here:
more news from ProPublicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
North Carolina Judicial Branch. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest judicial misconduct news, North Carolina Supreme Court spokesperson news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
North Carolina Supreme CourtProPublica
•85% Informative
North Carolina Supreme Court squashed disciplinary action against two Republican judges.
One of the judges ordered, without legal justification, that a witness be jailed.
The Judicial Standards Commission recommended that the court publicly reprimand both women.
The majority- Republican court gave no public explanation for rejecting the recommendations.
The commission’s work is confidential, but sources say it soon began investigating Burnette , Burnette and Hamilton .
Hamilton and Burnette violated multiple canons, sources say.
Sources say the commission recommended that the court give them public reprimands.
All judicial discipline serious enough to be issued by the Supreme Court becomes public, according to the rules of the commission.
North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Paul Newby called Justice Earls an “ AOC ’s AOC ” in a speech.
In June , Earls , the only person of color on the court, gave an interview to Law360 in which she criticized Newby and other conservative justices for refusing to address the lack of diversity in the state's court system.
VR Score
87
Informative language
87
Neutral language
56
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
22
Source diversity
12
Affiliate links
no affiliate links